始于2008  原始点差  不加佣金。
十七年信誉保障
零起付:0.01美元返佣也可以支付到账。
随时付:随时提现,无周期或次数限制。
免费付:不扣任何手续费,全额到账。
2016-03-22 19:17:17
通货膨胀的概念很好解释,但价格的上涨却极难预测。首先,统计员要搞清人们买了什么东西,购买的比例是多少(一篮子商品)。他们必须连续追踪这些产品的价格变化。最后,他们必须对新产品、口味变化及价格上涨做出解释。
大数据会让这一切变得简单。当前的美国消费者物价指数需要派遣工作人员到各个店铺去记录价格。这个篮子是基于消费者的调查,该数据每三天更新一次。这种方法与网购相比笨拙许多。从理论上讲,在线篮子和物价可以直接追踪数据。
美国技术公司奥多比正在尝试这一方法。公司从其客户浏览的网站中收集匿名的购买数据,美国500强零售商在线销量的四分之三都在统计之中。奥多比意图通过这庞大的信息数据来计算“在线物价指数”(DPI),从而同官方的通胀数据竞争。
与传统方式相比,DPI有很多优点。DPI 可以追踪140万种产品,而CPI只能追踪8万个。DPI追踪的是实际成交价格,而不是商场的广告价格,因此准确度更高。各国的经济学家们也可以从大量的数据中推断出价格变化对消费者购买意向的影响。
DPI指数完全不含线下价格以及汽油、租金等消费的价格,因此不可能取代CPI指数。但也表明了官方数据确实可能错过一些暴涨和暴跌的情况,尤其是在科技领域。研究人员发现,在DPI指数中,电脑的价格在今年一月下跌了13.1%,接近CPI数据的两倍,电视价格的跌幅也大于CPI数据。差距甚大的原因可能是技术更新的速度太快了。调查人员发现,80%的技术产品消费是购买新产品,而DPI指数能更灵敏地捕捉到数据的变化。
如果这种现象普遍存在,那么实际的通胀水平将低于官方数据。各国央行、借款人、节俭的人以及任何购买长期合约的投资者都要对此提高警惕。这也意味着 GDP 被低估了。如果整体消费水平是准确的,而通胀水平被高估,那么实际产出会高于预期水平。
官方的统计员也在完善他们的调查方式。CPI指数现在也涵盖了检索网站自动生成的数据。但若不尽早地对大数据加以重视,官方数据将迎来极其强大的竞争对手。
Big data provide new ways to gauge price rises
INFLATION is a simple concept, but price rises are surprisingly hard to measure. First, statisticians must work out what stuff people buy, and in what proportions (the “basket” of goods). Then they must track the prices of those goods over time. Finally they must decide how to account for new products, changing tastes and the fact that if the price of, say, apples rises, some people will buy another fruit instead rather than pay more.
Big data could make all of this easier. At the moment, calculating America’s consumer-price index (CPI) involves sending people into shops to note down prices. The basket is based on a survey of consumers which is updated only every three years or so. This looks increasingly cumbersome in a world where every online purchase is logged, somewhere, in a database. In theory online baskets and prices, at least, could be tracked digitally.
Adobe, a technology firm, is trying to do just that. The firm collects anonymised sales data from websites that use its software. The amount of data available is vast: according to the firm, it includes three-quarters of online spending at America’s top 500 retailers. It is using this ocean of information to compile a “digital price index” (DPI) to rival official measures of inflation. Two economists, Pete Klenow of Stanford University and Austan Goolsbee of the University of Chicago, are helping the firm to crunch the numbers.
The DPI has several advantages over the conventional approach. It tracks 1.4m goods, compared with the CPI’s 80,000. It is based on actual purchases rather than advertised prices, increasing its accuracy. And the volume of data allows Messrs Klenow and Goolsbee to use fancier statistical methods to account for people changing what they buy as prices move.
The new index completely misses changes in offline prices and spending on things like petrol and rent. It will not replace the CPI any time soon. It does suggest, however, that official statistics may themselves be missing big price movements, especially for consumer technology. The researchers found that the price of computers fell by 13.1% in the year to January, almost double the 7.1% fall recorded in the CPI. Televisions fell more in price than the CPI reports, too. The speed of innovation in technology might account for the difference. The researchers found that fully 80% of technology spending is on new products, which the more nimble DPI can incorporate quickly.
If this is a widespread phenomenon, and inflation is lower than officially recorded, that has implications for central bankers, borrowers, savers and anyone who strikes long-term contracts. It also means that GDP might be understated, says Mr Klenow. If overall spending is recorded accurately but inflation is exaggerated, output must be higher than thought.
Official statisticians are improving their methods. The CPI includes some prices that are collected automatically by “scraping” websites (something Britain’s statisticians are also experimenting with). But if their take-up of big data is sluggish, official statistics could eventually face disruptive private-sector competition.
本文翻译由兄弟财经提供
文章来源:http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21695097-big-data-provide-new-ways-gauge-price-rises-how-much-doggy
兄弟财经是全球历史最悠久,信誉最好的外汇返佣代理。多年来兄弟财经兢兢业业,稳定发展,获得了全球各地投资者的青睐与信任。历经十余年的积淀,打造了我们在业内良好的品牌信誉。
本文所含内容及观点仅为一般信息,并无任何意图被视为买卖任何货币或差价合约的建议或请求。文中所含内容及观点均可能在不被通知的情况下更改。本文并未考 虑任何特定用户的特定投资目标、财务状况和需求。任何引用历史价格波动或价位水平的信息均基于我们的分析,并不表示或证明此类波动或价位水平有可能在未来 重新发生。本文所载信息之来源虽被认为可靠,但作者不保证它的准确性和完整性,同时作者也不对任何可能因参考本文内容及观点而产生的任何直接或间接的损失承担责任。
外汇和其他产品保证金交易存在高风险,不适合所有投资者。亏损可能超出您的账户注资。增大杠杆意味着增加风险。在决定交易外汇之前,您需仔细考虑您的财务目标、经验水平和风险承受能力。文中所含任何意见、新闻、研究、分析、报价或其他信息等都仅 作与本文所含主题相关的一般类信息.
同时, 兄弟财经不提供任何投资、法律或税务的建议。您需向合适的顾问征询所有关于投资、法律或税务方面的事宜。
《通向财务自由之路》的作者范K·撒普博士指出:交易成本是影响交易绩效的重要因素之一。很少有交易系统可以创造比它的成本更高的利润。通过外汇返佣代理开户,可以大幅有效的降低交易成本,从而提升获利潜能、改善交易绩效。
风险提示:
金融产品保证金交易存在极高的风险,未必适合所有的投资者,请不要相信任何高额投资收益的诱导而贸然投资! 在您决定投资杠杆类金融产品时,请务必考虑您的经验水平和风险承受能力,投资导致的损失有可能超过存入的资金,因此您不应该以不能承受损失的资金来投资!投资风险不仅来自于杠杆交易,也有可能来自于交易商, 请仔细甄选合规的交易商以规避风险!所有投资者的交易帐户应仅限本人使用,不应交予第三方操作,任何由接受第三方喊单、操盘等服务而导致的风险和亏损应自己承担,责任自负!
兄弟财经是一间独立的咨询服务公司,不隶属于任何交易商,仅向投资者提供信息咨询、降低投资成本的咨询类服务。 兄弟财经不邀约客户投资任何杠杆类的金融产品,不接触投资者资金及账户信息,不提供交易建议,不提供操盘服务,不推荐交易商, 投资者自行选择交易商,兄弟财经仅提供信息咨询,交易商的任何行为均与兄弟财经无关!
投资者在兄弟财经进行任何咨询行为均代表接受和认可上述声明!
所有投资者均为自行选择且直接前往交易商官网进行投资行为(包括提交开户资料和存取资金),兄弟财经不承担客户与交易商之间的交易争议及由交易商问题造成经济损失的责任。 如果您不了解杠杆类金融产品市场的风险,请千万不要参与相关投资交易!
请确保您具备以下条件:专业级的投资知识与能力;可以承受损失的资本(亏损不会导致负债或影响生活)。否则切勿参与杠杆交易。